The Roulette Assistant

Martingale vs Paroli: 200,000 simulated roulette sessions

Martingale and Paroli compared with real numbers: 100,000 simulated sessions each on a single zero wheel. Win rates, bust rates, worst sessions, and why neither beats the house edge.

The two systems in one breath

Martingale: The Martingale doubles the stake after every loss and resets to the starting stake after every win. The idea is that one win recovers every loss in the run and adds one unit of profit on top.

Paroli: The Paroli is the Martingale turned around. You double the stake after a win and reset to the base stake after a loss, aiming to ride a short hot streak with the table money rather than your own.

The numbers side by side

100,000 simulated sessions each, same wheel, same starting 500 points, same base bet of 5.
MartingaleParoli
Sessions that finished ahead49.2%38.4%
Sessions that ran out of money50.1%0.0%
Average result per session-31.1 points-22.9 points
Typical (median) result-185 points-25 points
Worst session seen-500 points-350 points
Average total staked1,159.7 points843.6 points
Loss predicted by the edge31.3 points22.8 points
Martingale vs Paroli across 200,000 sessions Martingale finished ahead in 49.2% of sessions and ran out of money in 50.1%, with an average of -31.1 points and a worst session of -500 points. Paroli finished ahead in 38.4%, ran out of money in 0.0%, averaged -22.9 points, worst -350 points. Martingale Reverse Martingale, Paroli Finished ahead 49.2% 38.4% Ran out of money 50.1% 0.0% Average result, points -31.1 -22.9 Worst session, points -500 -350 Rates as shares of 100,000 sessions each; point bars show size, sign in the label.
The comparison in one figure: how often each system finishes ahead or runs dry, and what the average and worst sessions cost in points.

The honest verdict

Neither system beats the house edge, and the table shows it twice. Each system's average loss sits next to the loss the edge predicts from its own staking (31.3 points for Martingale, 22.8 points for Paroli): the wheel took its 1 in 37 of everything each system staked, and nothing more or less.

What actually differs is the shape of the risk. Martingale finished ahead more often (49.2% against 38.4%). Martingale emptied its bankroll more often (50.1% against 0.0%). Paroli lost less on average (-22.9 points against -31.1 points), mostly because it staked less in total. Choosing between them is choosing which kind of bad day you prefer, not which one wins.

Common questions

Which is better, Martingale or Paroli?

Neither, by expectation: both averaged a loss in line with the house edge applied to what they staked (-31.1 points against -22.9 points per session). They differ in risk shape. Martingale finished ahead more often (49.2% against 38.4%), while Martingale ran out of money more often (50.1% against 0.0%). Pick, if at all, by which bad day you would rather have.

Can I combine two systems to beat the wheel?

No. Any mix of two systems is still a sequence of bets on a wheel that keeps 1 point in 37 staked, so the combination changes the shape of your results, never their long run average. That is exactly what our side by side numbers show for each system alone.

Run both yourself

The Lab in the app runs either system with your own budget, base bet, and rounds, on virtual points. Watch each one's bad day happen instead of taking our word for it.

Test Martingale Test Paroli All strategies